Help Project Optimist shine!

Donate today

Community Voices ⎸ The pragmatic case for climate optimism

Author Charlie Sellars on how shifting our mindset from “minimizing footprint” towards “maximizing impact” can bring joy back into environmentalism.

Community Voices ⎸ The pragmatic case for climate optimism
A graphic of Earth, featured on the cover of Charlie Sellars' book "What We Can Do: A Climate Optimist’s Guide to Sustainable Living." (Courtesy of Charlie Sellars)

By Charlie Sellars

In the mid-2000s, British Petroleum popularized the concept of the “Carbon Footprint.”

In the 20 years since, the environmental movement has widely and ironically adopted this framing — originally promoted by the oil and gas industry — for how to conceive of our individual environmental impact.

While the responsibility of reducing our carbon footprint has thankfully since extended to companies too (thanks to the international Greenhouse Gas Protocol), the original framing of “minimization” of our carbon footprint has nevertheless persisted.

A man smiles as he looks to the upper left corner of the frame. He wears a green and blue plaid flannel shirt. He has short brown hair.
Charlie Sellars (Courtesy of Charlie Sellars)

Unfortunately, the philosophy of minimization is, psychologically speaking, easily tied to giving things up.
• What do I need to stop doing?
• What do I need to do less of?

This approach can lead to frustration or even shame, especially when comparing our actions against others:
• Why should I have to give up things I like when others aren’t?
• Why am I being judged for driving my gas car because I can’t afford (or don’t want) an EV?

And while the philosophy of minimization can galvanize some, it can also alienate others and lead to inaction. I call this climate doomism – the belief that nothing we do as individuals matters, so why do anything at all?

Unfortunately, in the eyes of the planet, climate doomism and climate denialism can be equally harmful. To the environment, the only thing that matters is whether the decisions we make as individuals and groups make the planet a better or worse place. 

But here’s the good news: what we do does still matter. The science shows there is still time to make an impact and to prevent the worst effects of climate change. I see this reinforced all the time in my day job as a sustainability leader. But how should we shift our mindsets?

Enter climate optimism.

🌻
Support journalism that informs + inspires: Donate to Project Optimist online here.

How we can try to maximize our impact instead

Climate optimism invites us to take a different approach. Instead of shaming us into doing less to protect the environment, it asks us instead:
• How can I maximize my impact?
• What can I add to my life to help the planet?

When we take this optimistic approach, our opportunity for impact multiplies: rather than only trying to minimize our footprint at home, what if we could add sustainability into the places we spend our time that have even more reach, such as our work or our communities?

A graphic with three circles. A small blue circle on the left has "Your Life" written in white. A medium-sized circle in the middle has "Your Work" written in white. A large blue circle has "Your Community" written in white. Underneath the three circles is an arrow that runs from left to right with the words "Opportunity for Impact" underneath.
Our opportunity for impact multiplies when we embed it across every facet of our lives. (Courtesy of Charlie Sellars)

As a real-world example, I tried to apply this “maximize impact” mindset to the physical design of my book. I worked with the publisher to answer the question: “How many cool sustainability features can we add to the book?” And it turns out: the answer is a lot!

It was exciting to explore additions to my book to make it more environmentally-friendly: there were some obvious ones, such as adding recycled paper and vegetable-based inks. But there were also some that you wouldn’t expect, such as opting for sewn-thread binding over glued binding for better longevity. We even explored adding sustainable fonts that consume less ink! (Though sadly they didn’t fit with the graphic direction of the overall book.)

An environmental benefits statement on Charlie Sellars' book. It says "Wise Ink Creative Publishing saved the following resources by printing the pages of this book on chlorine free paper made with 100% post-consumer waste." The table indicates that they saved 24 fully grown trees, 1,900 gallons of water, 10 million BTUs of energy, 80 pounds of solid waste, and 10,390 pounds of greenhouse gases.
The impact that came from designing the book to be more sustainable, based on initial print volume. (Courtesy of Charlie Sellars)

With this framing, climate optimism becomes a pragmatic solution to climate doomism. It’s not about feeling hopeless because we can’t do enough by ourselves, nor is it about burying our heads in the sand to ignore bad news. Rather, it is about reclaiming the joy that can come from becoming better stewards of our planet and using that joy to (re)inspire us to action.

Becoming empowered to be a climate optimist

Climate optimism is equal parts inspiration (the belief that what we do matters) and empowerment (having the tools to act upon that belief).

These ingredients are entwined in many ways. I’ve spoken to hundreds of people that have expressed that they don’t feel empowered on climate change, so they don’t feel inspired to act. 

🍃
Check out Project Optimist's coverage of the environment here.

Thankfully, from my time as a director of sustainability at Microsoft, I’ve been exposed to the industry’s most cutting-edge climate science and tools. And what I’ve learned is that recent advancements have given us profound insights to become empowered on climate change – but those tools have not yet fully diffused out to the average person (yet).

One such tool is the Life Cycle Assessment. It extends our understanding of the environmental impact of our products to include all the energy and emissions used in their supply chains on top of the energy involved with using and recycling the product. For simplicity, we can break the impact of our products into four categories:

A graphic shows a laptop computer in the middle. On the left is a blue graphic of a factory with the word "Make It" written above it. An arrow points to the right at a green graphic of a box with the words "Move It" written above. Another arrow points to the right toward a light blue graphic. It is a circle with an arrow inside, like a fuel gauge, with the words "Use It" written above. An arrow points down and to the right to another graphic. It features two teal arrows moving in a circle with a leaf in the center and the words "Lose It" above. .
Products use energy, water, and waste to Make It, to Move It, to Use It, and to Lose It (recycle it). (Courtesy of Charlie Sellars)

The results from this new approach to measuring impact are astounding. For example, there is so much energy used to make and to move the phone you’re reading this article on, that you would need to use your device for over a decade before you matched the energy it took to originally make it

It’s not just electronics; there’s a hidden environmental cost in the making and moving of almost everything we use or consume in our daily lives (especially food). While this may shock us, this also affords us a more holistic view.

An average American’s annual emissions impact, excluding emissions generated by activities when at work. (Courtesy of Charlie Sellars)

Herein lies the empowerment that underpins climate optimism; we are finally starting to see the data we need to feel confident that what we do matters. More companies than ever are using these frameworks to disclose the impact of their products. With that data can come the joy of pursuing the actions that we are personally fulfilled and excited by.

Maybe this is our invitation to learn a new skill and become tinkerers to repair our things, or our invitation to get creative in the kitchen, or to buy a fancy new electric heat pump.

Maybe this is our invitation to raise our hand at work to lead a plan to reduce waste, or to try adding a new green product to our store, or to even ask to build a sustainability plan.

How Extended Producer Responsibility will work in Minnesota
Project Optimist finds out how the law aimed at reducing packaging waste could affect taxpayers, businesses, and consumers.

Or maybe this is our calling for civic engagement, perhaps by being thoughtful in town halls, weighing in during public comment periods, or galvanizing votes for climate-friendly politicians.

This is why I am a climate optimist. We have more tools than ever before in human history to embed sustainability into everything we might do. 

And while none of us can realistically do everything, all of us can at least do something. And when a lot of us do something, we might just be capable of everything.

Charlie Sellars is the author of “What We Can Do: A Climate Optimist’s Guide to Sustainable Living,” and a director of sustainability at Microsoft.

This column was edited by Jen Zettel-Vandenhouten.

Sign up for Project Optimist's free newsletter

Get the latest headlines in your inbox once per week.